?

Log in

Previous Entry | Next Entry

This deserves to be spread around

As many of you have heard, ACOG and the AMA have really stepped in it, both writing reccomendations to introduce legislation making out of hospital birth illegal.  (For more information, try here,http://www.acog.org/from_home/publications/press_releases/nr02-06-08-2.cfm , and here ,http://www.aolcdn.com/tmz_documents/0617_ricki_lake_wm.pdf . 

Rixa's blog is a very good place to get a good overview of what is going on : http://rixarixa.blogspot.com/


Anyway, this was written by an OB/GYN (Dr. Fischbein)  who is also a member of ACOG, regarding their recent statement.  I seriously want to kiss this man.  Please read this! 

Douglas H. Kirkpatrick, MD
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
PO Box 96920
Washington, DC 20090-2188

Dear Sir:
I am a practicing OB/ GYN in southern California and Fellow of ACOG and recently was informed by midwife colleagues of your recommendation and encouragement for the AMA to lobby Congress for a law banning out of hospital birth. Funny that I had to hear of this decision from outside sources and was never approached by my college to see how I or my local colleagues felt about it. I have grave concerns regarding my organization taking such a stand. I think we are all agreed that ACOG has a statement regarding patients' rights to informed consent and informed refusal. Yet, it seems with every decision our organization moves further away from that basic tenet. ACOG's little "guideline" paper on VBAC in 2004 where the word readily was changed to immediately has had the chilling effect of doing away with VBAC options at hundreds if not more hospitals. Not due to patient safety, or the ideal of giving true informed consent but really, let's be honest, to fear of litigation. I have seen how patients have become counseled by obstetricians at facilities where VBAC has been banned. They are clearly given a skewed view of the risks of VBAC but rarely told of the risks of multiple surgeries. If you think this is untrue you are, sadly, out of touch with real clinical medicine.

As to out of hospital birthing, please give me the courtesy of an explanation as to the data you used and the process by which an organization which is supposed to represent me came to this conclusion. Any statement saying that it is as simple as patient safety and that one-size fits all hospital birth under the "obstetric model" of practice should be applied to all patients is, putting it nicely, not really in line with what best serves all our patients. In many instances, hospitals are not safe, certainly not nurturing and have a far worse track record for disasters than home birth. Even when emergency help is nearby this is true. The focus of all of us in medicine should be on reigning in trial lawyers and tort reform and lobbying Congress for that. The best interest of the college members and the patients we serve would be for my organization to spend its time and energy on something that has true benefit. Removing choices from well-informed patients and caring doctors and midwives is wholly un-American.

So please send me detailed information on how ACOG decided outlawing home birth was a wise thing to do. You must have scientific data to take such a drastic stand. Please make it available to me so that I may share it with like-minded colleagues. I would also like to know the process by which this came to pass. Who first raised this issue and why? What committee reviewed all the data and did its due diligence in interviewing those of us with long-standing experience in backing midwives who perform out of hospital births. There must be a fine, non-confidential paper trail you can share with your members. Specific names of committee member who voted for this would be enlightening and I am requesting this information. I would like to know the background and expertise regarding out of hospital birth for each member who had a hand in the decision to go to the AMA.

We live in an odd era where once something is said or recommended by a legitimate organization such as ACOG it has deep ramifications never intended such as becoming fodder for trial lawyers trying to squeeze the lifeblood and dignity out of your members. Or forcing women to travel hundreds of miles in labor to find a supportive facility. Or even worse, to have them arrive in a VBAC banned hospital and refuse surgery. Can this be the best we can do for our patients? Remember, your VBAC statement was meant to be only a recommendation but quickly became the rule by which hospital administrators, risk managers and anesthesia departments of smaller hospital banned this option for thousands of women. An option, that in proper hands, was the safe and accepted standard of care for 30 years. In fact, you still have an ACOG VBAC brochure that recommends this option! For those of us working at smaller hospitals where VBAC was banned due to lack of emergency help (anesthesia, OR crews, etc.) there is a big question that has perplexed us that no administrator seems to be willing or able to answer. That question is: "If a hospital cannot handle an emergency c/section for VBACs, and most emergency are for fetal bradycardia, hemorrhage (ie. abruption) or shoulder dystocia not for ruptured uteri, then how can they do obstetrics at all?" For they seem to still be able to have a maternity ward without in house anesthesia. Will someday ACOG, in their great wisdom but seeming disconnect from reality, make a "recommendation" that little hospitals stop providing obstetric services? Will this better serve women and their communities throughout America?

I am frightened and angered by what you have done in my name. Now I ask you to defend your position in encouraging the AMA to lobby Congress for another restriction on the freedom of choice that belongs to women and their families. Those choices include midwifery and the right to have the most beautiful and life changing event occur wherever best fits their desire. Midwives are well trained and required to have obstetrical backup. They have very special relationships with their patients and want the very best outcomes for them. They do not need me or you to police them. We have a habit inour country over the past 40 years of thinking we can legislate out stupidity. All that has done is erode the individual freedoms that belong, by birthright, to each of us. I would hope you trust your Fellows to know their specialty, their colleagues, and what is best for the patient as an individual. These decisions do not belong to politicians or faceless committees. You should have more faith in your members to give balanced informed consent. Again, my recommendation to you is to put all your considerable energy into changing our legal malpractice system. Those of us actually practicing medicine and caring for patients know this to be the greatest threat to the mission and responsibility we have chosen to undertake.

I look forward to your response and possibly the beginning of a meaningful dialogue.

Sincerely,
Stuart J. Fischbein, MD FACOG
Medical Advisor, Birth Action Coalition

Tags:

Comments

( 11 comments — Leave a comment )
muirichinnahali
Jun. 29th, 2008 03:18 pm (UTC)
isn't it awesome?!
season_changing
Jun. 29th, 2008 03:23 pm (UTC)
It was, I seriously was "whooping" at the pc screen, lol.
whollydevoted
Jun. 29th, 2008 03:22 pm (UTC)
yay!
moonshineray
Jun. 29th, 2008 03:35 pm (UTC)
"We have a habit in our country over the past 40 years of thinking we can legislate out stupidity."

And all of it. YES YES YES!!!
About time someone with an MD in his name said it.

Seriously.

AWESOME.
season_changing
Jun. 29th, 2008 03:39 pm (UTC)
Yeah, that has got to be the best quote out of the whole thing!
mahogany
Jun. 29th, 2008 04:28 pm (UTC)
WOW!!!
kirin76
Jun. 29th, 2008 05:42 pm (UTC)
what a breath of fresh air. Let us all pray it actually makes a difference!
scrappinmama
Jun. 29th, 2008 11:39 pm (UTC)
My one question on the whole lets ban out of hospital births, what about the Amish communities. Most of them do have their babies in an Amish hospital or have a midwife present at home but really, if I want my baby delivered at home or in a car or in the woods, I should have the right to do so. Last time I checked, it was a choice to have a baby and as such, we should be able to make all of the choices regarding such a huge life altering decision.
season_changing
Jun. 30th, 2008 12:10 am (UTC)
Agreed. This is an attack on basic human rights.
veggiemama
Jul. 1st, 2008 01:56 pm (UTC)
hi!
I saw one of your posts on the celiac community and had to click to see your journal because of your user icon. My first three kids were c-sections but my last one was a homebirth. I've been nursing for almost 7 straight years, but only one kid now :). Take a look at my profile, see if you think we might click. If so, great, if not, no biggie.
season_changing
Jul. 1st, 2008 02:29 pm (UTC)
Re: hi!
I will do! Consider yourself Added!
( 11 comments — Leave a comment )